|
Technology Adoption in Mathematics Education: A Global Perspective
A Short Article Series
December 2005
E-assessment:
why, what for and how
George
Fernandez & Gary
Fitz-Gerald
Australia
3 A
DETAILED EXAMPLE
Simple Differential
Equations
This example illustrates
the difference in how to use an e-assessment
approach instead of a traditional approach.
In Engineering and Science courses a
student’s ability to correctly
and accurately determine the solution
of a homogeneous, second order differential
equation with real constant coefficients
is a fundamental requirement. Such a
topic is usually introduced in a first
year calculus course by seeking solutions
arising in RLC circuit theory or damped
oscillatory behaviour in simple mechanical
contexts. To be able to correctly solve
such equations students need to be able
to:
• write down the correct auxiliary
(or characteristic) equation
• solve the resulting quadratic
equation
• identify the roots as distinct
and real, real and repeated or complex
conjugates
• construct the corresponding
basis of the solution space
• deduce the final solution.
The second and third
of these items are skills that students
normally bring from a successful completion
of a prerequisite course at secondary
school level. The remaining items build
on this knowledge base to achieve the
required outcome.
Traditional methods of formative assessment
built around print media would involve
a specific limited set of examples with
answers usually to be found in another
location, such as at the back of a text
book. In e-assessment—armed with
a robust Computer Aided Assessment package
such as WebLearn—an infinite variety
of such examples can be generated dynamically
as required, marked almost immediately
and, where necessary, with feedback
tailored to misunderstandings identified
by virtue of the incorrect answer that
has been supplied. The randomness built
into such systems also ensures that
any one question is very unlikely to
be repeated for different students,
or for the same student at different
attempts. Consequently, there is no
opportunity for students to simply rely
on their memory in order to obtain correct
answers. This encourages the aspects
of deeper understanding that instruction
is trying to achieve.
In traditional forms of teaching, the
most common approach is to give students
an equation to solve, and address their
questions and difficulties as they arise.
In student-centred online learning,
however, the formative assessment tasks
to support learning of this topic should
first address each of the five steps
outlined above. This may be done in
a number of ways. Assuming that the
first step has been set up as a learning
objective, the simplest way to test
it is by providing a randomly generated
second order constant coefficient differential
equation, and requesting the corresponding
auxiliary equation as a response. If
incorrect, suitable feedback would point
the student to available online notes
or similar examples and invite more
attempts. In cases where their provided
answer demonstrates known misunderstandings,
specific feedback to that effect can
be provided.
Assuming now that the second step has
been made as a learning objective under
specific investigation, the simplest
way to test it is to provide a randomly
generated quadratic equation (with coefficients
lying in sets for which ‘reasonable’
solutions will exist) and providing
appropriate feedback if the supplied
answers are incorrect. If so, feedback
similarly to the previous case may be
provided.
Additionally, in most instances the
answers supplied after an incorrect
response could also be analysed with
regard to their correctness for the
given response, and suitable feedback
could be provided. Correctness or otherwise
of each subsequent step in the calculation
could also be provided, despite the
calculation at this stage being incorrect.
Although in e-assessment this is almost
a trivial task, in a traditional approach
this has massive resource implications,
especially for large enrolment classes.
Assuming that these two combined represent
the learning objective under investigation,
the first and second steps may then
be combined and appropriate positive
feedback provided if:
- the auxiliary equation is incorrect:
provide suitable feedback along the
lines described above.
Additionally, the answers supplied
to this incorrect auxiliary equation
could also be analysed
with regard to their correctness for
this equation and suitable feedback
could be provided.
- the auxiliary equation is correct
but incorrect roots are provided:
provide suitable feedback
along the lines described above.
Similarly for the
others, until the fifth step is reached.
At each stage, if a mistake is made
then subsequent calculations based on
these incorrect values can also be compared
with the provided answers to ascertain
whether the correct method has been
adopted after the error. In this way,
even though the problem is not the one
asked, it can serve the purpose of providing
another ‘randomly generated’
example for establishing the level of
understanding the student has reached.
Given that this is the learning objective
under specific investigation, appropriate
positive feedback can then be provided
if
- the auxiliary equation is incorrect:
provide suitable feedback along the
lines described above.
- the auxiliary equation is correct
but incorrect roots are provided:
provide suitable feedback along the
lines described above.
- the identification of the characteristics
of the roots may or may not be explicitly
designated as a learning objective.
If it is, and the answer supplied
is incorrect: provide suitable feedback
along the lines described above.
- the basis of the solution space
is incorrect: provide suitable feedback
along the lines described above. An
error at this stage could be due to
several reasons ranging from a totally
wrong form of the proposed answer
to a solution space that is not of
order two.
- the final solution is not a suitable
linear combination of the functions
in the solution space:
provide suitable feedback along the
lines described above
|
Editor Page
Articles by Country
Australia
China
Hong Kong
Japan
Korea
Malaysia
Singapore
Slovakia
United Kingdom
 |